Authorities have called it as one of the largest deceptions of its kind in the UK.
A total of 14 people have been found guilty for their role in a £28m conspiracy to defraud over 3,500 vacation property owners.
The victims were desperate to terminate decades-old holiday ownership agreements and sought out help.
Most were in the age range of 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them parted with in excess of £10,000, and a single victim paid over £80,000.
Those targeted were exposed to high-pressure consultations lasting up to six hours. They were out of money, owning valueless fake "rewards" and remained trapped in costly holiday ownership agreements they frequently were unable to use.
The firm at the centre of the scam was the organization in question. They took customers' funds to fund the owners' luxurious way of life of exclusive education, millionaire mansions and personal aircraft.
The individual at the helm of the company, the main defendant, was handed a 90-month sentence in January for fraudulent conspiracy.
On Friday, his wife Nicola was one of the final three to receive sentencing.
She was handed a two-year deferred imprisonment at the London court after pleading guilty to financial crime.
This has been a lengthy process and signifies a significant success for the people who spoke out, the authorities and the Crown.
The first knowledge of the firm emerged during the that particular year. The role involved in the reporting team of a broadcasting service, producing current affairs shows.
A colleague pointed out that his mother had inherited the rights of a timeshare apartment in the Spanish coast and, after years of holidays, had begun looking to terminate the agreement.
It should be noted how popular vacation properties had grown with English tourists in the 1980s and 1990s.
Holiday ownership allowed families to access the identical property every year, or swap their time slots with additional holders who had apartments in different locations. Approximately 600,000 sun-lovers seized that opportunity.
The initial boom was accompanied by a numerous reports about unscrupulous sellers fraudulently marketing investments. They appeared frequently on consumer shows.
The standard holiday ownership agreement bound owners for many years.
By 2016, those investors who had used their regular accommodation in the resort for decades were getting older, and many were hoping to wave goodbye to their vacation investments.
A number had reduced ability to travel and found it difficult to access their properties. Others just believed they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had passed away, in many cases leaving their heirs to assume the deals - plus their annual payments and service charges.
This was the situation the family member had been placed. She searched the web for options and discovered SMT, a business whose website assured to terminate her deal.
However, having submitted funds and booked a meeting with them, her loved ones smelled a rat.
Further research uncovered hundreds of people reporting they had handed over cash and got nothing from the service. Actually, they had suffered financially. A lot of it.
The investigative unit started looking into what was happening. It soon emerged that there were dubious individuals active in the timeshare resale sector.
A legal professional had numerous client reports waiting to sue SMT.
We spoke to clients who had dealt with the organization and they all told the same story. They believed the business would purchase their timeshare away from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they submitted funds initially) they were told there was no potential buyers.
Instead, they were pushed - indeed coerced - to spend more money purchasing "the company's points system", linked to the outfit's parent company, the overarching entity.
The precise definition was somewhat vague. They sounded like a form of credit, offering cheaper vacations and amenities and retail offers.
And they were apparently "tradable" with fellow investors, at a future date.
Paying cash immediately would lead to an long-term benefit that would pay for SMT's fees and result in the property owner with a gain, liberated eventually from their burdensome contract.
An unrealistic promise? Indeed, it was.
Based on these descriptions were accurate, this was a large-scale fraud.
The technique is termed a "bait-and-switch."
Someone - in this case the company - "lures the customer by promoting a defined offering only to then say that's not available, steering the customer towards a different, lower-quality offering.
This is against the law. Equipped with all the evidence we had collected, we made the case to secretly film one of the organization's sessions.
This takes dedication, work, and compelling reasons for why this is the only way to gather the data necessary to confirm deceptive practices.
Once authorized, our limited crew organized a consultation with one of the firm's agents in Stratford-Upon-Avon.
Pretending to be a potential client wanting to assist his parent out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement
A seasoned outdoor journalist and gear tester with over a decade of experience exploring rugged terrains across the UK and Europe.